COVID-19 Advice to clients
  • We will not be hosting meetings at our offices until further notice.
  • We respectfully ask that our clients consider conference calls as an alternative to face-to-face meetings.
  • We have limited non-essential business travel and minimised external meetings.
  • Our teams are in constant communication and we have set up an emergency response group to co-ordinate our communications and to ensure that we take all recommended precautions.

Our cases: Sannie and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department

5245491755_14fc062513_b

The Case

Immigration European Economic Area nationals. The first claimant had been granted a residence card for the United Kingdom on the ground of being an extended family member of an EEA member.

Subsequently, the second claimant, who was the wife of the first claimant, applied for a residence permit also on the grounds of being an extended family member, namely the sister-in-law. The defendant Secretary of State refused the second claimant’s application and revoked the first claimant’s residence card on the grounds that it had been granted by way of administrative error and the first claimant had not met the criteria as set out in the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006, SI2006-1003 (the Regulations). Following two unsuccessful appeals, the claimants appealed to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, who upheld the earlier decisions and held, inter alia, that it was implicit within the Regulations for the Secretary of State to refuse to renew or revoke a residence permit-card when a claimant had, in fact, never met the necessary criteria in the first place.

Practice Areas

Immigration

Download in PDF

Sannie and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department – LexisWeb

Original URL

http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2013/october/sannie-and-another-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department

Details

Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2013] All ER (D) 338 (Oct)
Neutral Citation: [2013] EWCA Civ 1638
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge: Sir Terence Etherton C, Hallett and Sharp LJJ (judgment delivered extempore)
Representation Paul Dipre (instructed by Calices Solicitors) for the claimants.
Samantha Broadfoot (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 30 October 2013
  • About post
©2011 - 2015 Calices Solicitors. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. SRA No. 00558941. VAT No. GB139059205. Registered Intermediary with The Football Association No. IMS000975. | Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Website by: Agency
We cannot guarantee that the content is always accurate and up to date, or that it applies to your individual circumstances or the individual circumstances of your business. The content of this website is not intended to be used as a substitute for legal or professional advice. You should seek any appropriate professional advice relevant to your particular circumstances. The information on this website has been provided using sources from http://gov.uk and http://planningportal.gov.uk (Open Government License), http://wikipedia.en (Wikipedia license). We cannot accept responsibility for the quality or accuracy of content on this website or ensure that it is presented in both English and Welsh languages.